November 5, 2016 Fox News apologizes for falsely reporting that Clinton faces indictment

Fox News anchor Bret Baier apologized Friday for reporting that federal investigators had determined that Hillary Clinton�s private email server had been hacked and that an investigation would lead to an indictment of Clinton after the election.

In fact, Baier said, after checking with his sources, there is no evidence at this time for either statement.

Baier, the anchor of Fox�s evening newscast �Special Report,� went on the air Wednesday to report that the FBI had determined that Clinton�s private server, which she used while serving as secretary of state, had been hacked by �five foreign intelligence agencies.�

He further said on Thursday, during an interview with Fox�s Brit Hume, that a separate FBI investigation � of the charitable Clinton Foundation � was �likely� to lead to an indictment of Clinton after Tuesday�s election.

Both statements, if true, would be explosive developments in the late stages of the presidential campaign between Clinton and Republican rival Donald Trump. Trump has repeatedly invoked the alleged atmosphere of corruption around the Clinton Foundation and the security risks involved in Clinton�s use of a private server while secretary of state as reasons not to vote for Clinton. But neither of his reports about Clinton were accurate, Baier acknowledged Friday morning in a �Fox News alert� conversation with Fox News anchor Jon Scott. Baier said he relied on a single anonymous source within the FBI for his report about an alleged hack of the server: �I was quoting from one source about his certainty that the server had been hacked by five foreign intelligence agencies. .?.?. As of today there still are no digital fingerprints of a breach, no matter what the working assumption is within the bureau.�

He added, �All the time, but especially in a heated election, on a topic this explosive, every word matters no matter how well sourced.� He went on to describe his comment to Hume about an indictment � which he has previously called �inartful� � as more than that.

�I explained the phrasing of one my answers to Brit Hume on Wednesday night, saying it was inartful the way I answered the last question about whether the investigations would continue after the election. And I

Um… he might want to get actual documents from sources before he just starts claiming stuff on TV. Both because you never know these days, and because people familiar with the matter” isn’t enough anymore. that’s why Wikileaks is better at this than anyone else.

articles election journalism politics

Previous post
Chelsea Manning Tried Committing Suicide a Second Time in October WASHINGTON � Chelsea Manning tried to commit suicide last month as she was
Next post
Auto Format Twitter, by its own hand or some sudden shift in trends, will one day die. What will I do then? The engine of my thought is always